CAMHER-9C4BA8: Gold Anglo Saxon pendant with D-shaped cabochon garnet setting

Rights Holder: The British Museum
CC License:


Rights Holder: The British Museum
CC License:

Rights Holder: The British Museum
CC License:

Image use policy

Our images can be used under a CC BY attribution licence (unless stated otherwise).

ASSEMBLAGE

Unique ID: CAMHER-9C4BA8

Object type certainty: Certain
Workflow status: Published Find published

CURATOR'S REPORT
Anglo Saxon assemblage of grave goods from Westfield Farm, Ely, Cambridgeshire

Description of finds
The grave goods were associated with an older juvenile burial, qualifying under the Treasure Act. The burial forms part of a small 7th century cemetery, identified and investigated during archaeological excavation.
The artefacts comprise of a necklace, with gold and silver pendants, a silver pin and chain, two glass palm cups, a single sided bone comb, iron knife and iron fittings from a box, within which some of the grave goods were buried.

Discussion of bulla pendants (Catherine Hills)
This type of pendant is widespread across England, and has been dated most commonly to the second half of the 7th century (Geake 1997: 36). The examples from Buttermarket grave 4275 were part of a necklace which also included coins with a suggested terminus post quem of 660/680. Southampton stadium grave no. 4203 contained a necklace similar to that from Westfield, with four silver bulla pendants, a few beads and crescent shaped pendants which, though not like the cross from Ely, would nonetheless have presented a similar composition. At Winchester (Hawkes 1990), there was a more complex necklace with silver rings and glass beads as well as one gold and two silver bullae, and also three other gold pendants, two with garnet settings, similar to the gold/garnet pendant from Westfield Farm Grave 1.

Discussion of gold and garnet pendants (Catherine Hills)

Gold and garnet pendants are found in many other 7th-century burials, especially in Kent, but also East Anglia, for example Boss Hall, Ipswich where they were associated with a sceatta of c. 690 (Webster and Backhouse 1991). The most elaborate necklace recorded is that from Desborough (Webster and Backhouse 1991, fig. 13). This is far more elaborate and complete than others mentioned here. But one feature it shares with Westfield Farm Grave 1 is the central gold cross pendant. At Desborough this is a simple gold cross, while at Ely it is a pendant which once had settings in its arms and centre, though these are now missing. This pendant is odd in that it is missing the fourth arm but otherwise takes the shape of a "Celtic" cross like other more elaborate gold and garnet pendants such as Ixworth. Cross pendants are usually taken as indicators of the Christianity of their owner and so dated by association with historical accounts of the date of conversion of the relevant region of England. There are several weak points in this argument, but it is clear that most such pendants do belong to the 7th century, and that some, if not all of them, had an original connection with Christianity.

Discussion of silver pin and chain
Silver or copper alloy pins linked by chains are known from 7th- and 8th-century burial and settlement contexts. At Harford Farm (Penn 2000), linked pins were found in grave 18, together with a workbox, pendants and coins.

Chronology

All types of artefacts found at Westfield Farm are known from other burials dated to the 7th century AD. Helen Geake's (1997) seriation of finds from conversion period graves identifies five groups, A-E. Group D, distinguished clearly from preceding groups, and dated 650-720/30, includes key types found at Westfield: the humpbacked comb, bulla pendants, plain palm cups, workboxes and linked pins. On her classification then these burials are likely to belong to the later part of the 7th century. The review of dating for individual types above confirms that. However, there is perhaps some contradiction between the late 7th-century date suggested for some types, such as workboxes, and the mid 7th-century date suggested by Scull for the Buttermarket grave with two palm cups (see below). Of all artefact types, one might expect glass vessels to have been too fragile to have survived intact for many years after manufacture. It may have been that the workbox and other 'late' types were in fact being made from the mid 7th-century, and so were buried at Westfield when new: examination of the workbox for repairs, or wear etc. might help here. Alternatively, the plain palm cups may have been made later. Another possibility is that these two glass vessels were indeed valuable and may have been carefully curated. The last scenario is perhaps the most interesting, but perhaps the most simple explanation is that the central Grave 1 with the palm cups, was earlier than those which surrounded it, including Grave 2 with the workbox. The historical context of the cemetery It is worth attempting greater precision on the cemetery dating because of the historical accounts relating to Ely. Bede records that Aethelthryth, wife of Ecgfrith of Northumbria, left him to become a nun, and founded a monastery at Ely. This was in the 670s, and she died in 679, from a tumour on her neck which Bede says she regarded as punishment for having worn necklaces when younger. The search for a suitable sarcophagus in which to bury her led the monks to the "civitatulum... desolatum... Grantacaestir vocatur" usually taken as the first documentary reference to Cambridge (Bede IV 19).

Do the Westfield Farm burials belong to the 670s, in which case they would have been contemporary with Aethelthryth, or to the end of the 7th century, a generation after her death? In either case the burials took place close to a Christian community living on a limited area of land in the fens. We might expect members of the monastic community to have been buried near the church, which these are not (although they do lie just 650m west of the possible monastic site at St John's Farm), but given the variety of burial form and location current at the time even that cannot be ruled out. Those buried in Graves 1 and 2 were elite females, the type of women who joined nunneries founded by royalty, one of them wearing a necklace of the kind Aethelthryth blamed for her illness, and including a Christian cross pendant. One of the most intriguing aspects of this site is the youth of both of these burials: Grave 1 is currently thought to be between 10 and 12 years of age, while the ?female in Grave 2 is a little older at 15 to 17 years. The elaborate burial of young (presumably female) members of the community, while other older female and male individuals are barely furnished, or are buried unaccompanied, is something which demands exploration in the publication of this site.

Subsequent actions

Current location of find: Remains with excavation archive

Treasure details

Treasure case tracking number: 2007T349

Chronology

Broad period: EARLY MEDIEVAL
Subperiod from: Early
Period from: EARLY MEDIEVAL
Period to: EARLY MEDIEVAL
Ascribed Culture: Anglo-Saxon
Date from: AD 600
Date to: AD 700

Dimensions and weight

Quantity: 26

Discovery dates

Date(s) of discovery: Friday 1st December 2006 - Sunday 31st December 2006

Personal details

Found by: This information is restricted for your login.
Recorded by: Ms Sarah Poppy
Identified by: Cambridge Archaeological Unit

Other reference numbers

Other reference: 2007 T349
Treasure case number: 2007T349

Materials and construction

Primary material: Gold

Spatial metadata

Region: Eastern (European Region)
County or Unitary authority: Cambridgeshire (County)
District: East Cambridgeshire (District)
To be known as: EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE

Spatial coordinates


Grid reference source: From finder
Unmasked grid reference accurate to a 100 metre square.

Discovery metadata

Method of discovery: Controlled archaeological investigation (stratified)
Current location: Remains with excavation archive
General landuse: Cultivated land
Specific landuse: Character undetermined

References cited

Similar objects

Find number: CAM-B4681D
Object type: ASSEMBLAGE
Broadperiod: EARLY MEDIEVAL
Circumstances of discovery: From the 29th November to the 22nd December 2006 a team from the Cambridge Archaeological Unit (CAU) undertook…
Workflow: Awaiting validationFind awaiting validation

Find number: PAS-266454
Object type: PENDANT
Broadperiod: EARLY MEDIEVAL
Triangular gold pendant with a facetted garnet inlay, the setting with a beaded border within simple margins. At the top, the scars and solde…
Workflow: PublishedFind published

Find number: NCL-A09134
Object type: PENDANT
Broadperiod: EARLY MEDIEVAL
CURATOR'S REPORT 7th-Century Anglo-Saxon Grave Finds (Treasure Annual Report 2007, no. 184). Description of find Gold Pendant Decorate…
Workflow: PublishedFind published

Timeline of associated dates

Audit data

Recording Institution: CAM
Created: 10 years ago
Updated: 4 years ago

Other formats: this page is available as qrcode json xml geojson pdf rdf representations.