Guidance for landowners, occupiers and tenant farmers in England and Wales

Metal-detecting, Field-walking and Searching for Archaeological Objects: guidance for landowners, occupiers and tenant farmers in England and Wales

This guidance had been jointly produced by the Country, Land & Business Association, the National Farmers Union and the Portable Antiquities Scheme, September 2010.

Introduction

Benefits

Permission

Finds Agreement

Restrictions

Metal-detecting Rallies

Katie recording the Iron Age gold stater

Illegal Searching

Ownership of Archaeological Objects

Recording and Reporting - Treasure

Other (non-Treasure) finds

Landowners' and Farmer Occupiers' Checklist

Other issues

Will the reporting of finds lead to archaeological excavation?

In a very small number of cases it is possible that an archaeologist might want to follow up a discovery with excavation. For example, if a coin hoard is discovered it may be useful to undertake a small excavation to learn more about why the find was buried. Archaeologists will always need the landowner/farmer occupier's permission to carry out further work including excavation. They will also produce a 'project plan' outlining what they want to do, how and when, including any damage to crop or property and the full and proper restoration of the area afterwards. Archaeological excavation can be a very expensive process which is not undertaken lightly. It is standard practice that finds recovered by archaeologists are deposited (as part of the site archive) with a local museum for public benefit.

If finds are reported and something interesting is discovered, then might this not restrict what I can do on the land?

It is unlikely that metal-detector or field-walked finds alone would lead to restrictions on farming or lead to an area being protected (scheduled), but they do help archaeologists understand the risk to underlying archaeology and/or the archaeological potential of the land if it is ever developed. While archaeology might impact on planned development (and the developer is expected to cover the costs of any appropriate archaeological work needed) metal-detected or field-walked finds alone are unlikely to impede development.

If a finder asks me to plough deeper in the hope of recovering further objects, what should I do?

Ploughing can cause damage to undisturbed archaeology and loss of information about the past, so if requested by a finder deep-ploughing should be resisted. It is likely that many of the objects uprooted would not be found immediately and would subsequently become damaged and be of less (archaeological and financial) value. It is better for objects in undisturbed ground to be excavated properly, although archaeologists (given limited resources) will normally only excavate sites at greatest risk of damage or those of greatest importance. It is also possible that deep ploughing could bring buried debris, such as building rubble, to the surface which could interfere with cultivation.

Further Information

Social Bookmarking: