Sussex

As promised back in July I have had another interesting swivel:

SUSS-101B44 is of a more typical form than the one I highlighted previously (SUSS-225F31). It has a small loop with animal heads at the ends biting a domed centre from which projects a circular pin. This is the ‘male’ half of a two part swivel, similar to SF-CA5816.

What is particularly interesting to me is the remains of strap ends attached on to the loop of the swivel. Their form means they were attached during manufacture and couldn’t be removed. I had always assumed the straps simply went through the loop of the swivel and rubbed directly on it. This solution, with the strap ends, both reduces the wear on the strap if it is moving a great deal and also allows two straps to be taken off the same swivel.

A quick search has not brought up any parallels although more diligent searching might bring some to light. It may be this was a particular response to the need to take two straps off one swivel or to using straps of a different, less hard-wearing material, a woven strip rather than leather perhaps. Again this item sheds new light on a common class of artefact and helps us understand them in a different way and perhaps highlights again that this is a class of artefact that would benefit from more research.

I’m afraid (or possibly rather pleased) it has been very busy here with many finds to record so I have not posted for a while. To make up for it here are three interesting finds from the last few weeks to bring to your attention, unusually two of them involve iron which due to its poor of preservation in disturbed contexts such as plough soil is often poorly represented  amongst the stray finds we deal with. The vast majority of iron items we see are either modern, where they can be identified usually from farm machinery, or small fragments which are so corroded and fragmentary as to make identification impossible.

SUSS-846943 is a contemporary copy of a Roman coin with an iron core and copper outer surface. If you zoom in closely on the image you can see where the iron core has rusted, expanded and ‘exploded’ through the copper surface. Contemporary copies (as opposed to modern fakes) of Roman coins are not uncommon. Firstly there are the very common copies of radiates and mid-to late 4th century nummi made in something close to the right metal but smaller in size. Secondly there are copper cored silver coins; these are also not rare, it sometimes feels like there are as many contemporary copies of later 2^nd century denarii out there as official types. Here are two typical silver plated copper cored coins in different states of preservation, the one on the right shows how the plating is often still in good condiiton and hard to spot.

Iron cored copies of precious metal coins are know (e.g. SUR-379FD1 and KENT-68D276) but are much rarer than copper cored examples. It could possibly be an accident of preservation with the iron rusting away to nothing but if that was the case you might expect more partially corroded and damaged examples to come to light, after all the gold and silver casings are not negligible in size. This suggests this coin is rare in general in having an iron core as well as being highly unusual as a plated copy of a copper coin.

The coin being copied is an As of Claudius I with Minerva on the reverse. Contemporary copies of these coins are not at all unusual, they are often crude and ‘barbarous’ in style with the left facing long necked head on the obverse and  figure advancing right with circular shield flanked by a large ‘S-C’ on the reverse being all that clearly remains of the original design, like this second example. There are many recorded on the database and using the new Roman numismatic search you can quickly pull out all the As of Claudius I for comparison.

Copies of Claudian As are common on early military sites and there is some suggestion that they may in fact have been minted semi-officially by local garrisons who were used to having small change to use for transactions. The argument runs that in the early days after the conquest there was not enough coinage in the country for soldiers everyday needs so they produced their own (see Boon, G. 1988, ‘Counterfeit Coins in Roman Britain’ in Casey & Reese eds., Coins and the Archaeologist London). Civilian populations in some areas, including Sussex, has also got used to low value coins including copper before the conquest and may have felt their lack and produced local alternatives.

In terms of ‘fakes’, excluding modern copies there are three main categories, firstly there are precious metals coins with cores of lower value metals, definitely contemporary copies or fakes designed to deceive, secondly there are smaller and crudely made ‘barbarous copies’ which don’t deceive for an instant and therefore must have been tolerated by the person paid in them, if not, usually, state officials, thirdly there are reasonably made copies in something that looks close to the original metal, these may have operated similarly to the second group or be passed off as genuine coins. While as a cored copy we would usually place this coin in the first category as part of a group with crudely copied designs it perhaps sits more happily in the second group. Interesting BH-40AF20 one of the few other iron cored copper coins I have traced is a barbarous radiate, again part of our second group of copies.

If both the buyer and seller happily use it to settle a transaction knowing it is not an ‘official coin’ we could argue it stops being a ‘fake’ and becomes something else, perhaps the best word for it is ‘token’ (but the long ‘when is a coin not a coin’ discussion is definitely one for another occasion…)

A rather lovely swivel

As promised in the initial post, a rather lovely swivel.

Slightly cheating this as I recorded it a few weeks back, but I’m returning it to the finder this week so have been reviewing it. It is related in form and date to the rather more common double loop swivels with zoomorphic terminals where the animal heads at the ends of the loop bite the central swivelling piece. Like this one:

The more common type of double loop swivel SUSS-225F31

The one at the top has a more elaborate swivelling mechanism, one larger loop and one terminal which reminds me personally of the figure of eight spur terminals and may have has a similar function with two small straps attached by hooked strap ends (of which more in a few weeks). On a passing note the swivel also reminded me of SUSS-53ED36 which presumably once also swivelled before corrosion fixed them both.

There are a few parallels for this form including one excavated in London  and misidentified initially as a tap as it lacked the figure of eight terminal, and a elaborate example to end all elaborate examples from Winchester. More details and links to the parallels (as for all the finds featured here) can be seen on the record:SUSS-225F31 so no point repeating them.

I have to confess to some personal qualms about the identification of all these swivels as animal leash pieces, not least because there is a Late Medieval carved panel in the V and A from Germany showing one being used to suspend a purse. It is definitely a topic ripe for more research if anyone fancies taking on the challenge. In the meantime I hope you enjoyed seeing it.

One of the commonest questions I’m asked in my job is: “seen any nice finds recently?”. The answer is, always, “Yes”. I’m always seeing, and recording,  nice finds, interesting finds, odd finds and pretty finds. The problem is sometimes I see so many that they slip out of the forefront of my mind, or the reason I find them interesting is a bit complicated to explain and therefore I find it hard to convey with words quite how nice the find was. “I had this fascinating Medieval swivel fitting of a type that had been mis-identifed as a tap” just doesn’t express it somehow.

So that is what this blog is for. I thought of calling it: Laura’s Find of the Week but you know what life is like, a weekly post might be ambitious, we’ll see. This blog will be devoted to sharing with you the nice finds, interesting finds, odd finds and pretty finds that come across my desk on a weekly basis as an FLO . Or just givng me a chance to get over my excitment about an object even if no-one reads it. They will all be up on the database but in a sea of 400,000 options I know it can be had to see the pretty silver needles for the mass of gold straw.