Mlitt topic

June 6th, 2008 by Frances McIntosh

Just in case anyone is interested, I will be doing my MLitt dissertation on Roman brooches from the North of England, focussing on stray finds and using PAS data. Here is my research proposal.

Romano-British Brooches: a study of creolization in the northern frontier through material culture

A wealth of artefactual data from the Roman period in Britain has been generated over the past decade due to continued excavations and recent publications, as well as the inception of the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS)[1].  Despite this wealth of data, there is comparatively little synthesis and interpretation. This is particularly the case for the data produced by the PAS which has previously been thought of as not a completely valid data set, as unstratified finds. This is starting to change with various works by leading Roman finds specialists and forthcoming PAS Conference Proceedings, PhDs and other postgraduate study using PAS data. This research will attempt to pull together the data on stray finds of Roman brooches from the North, studying Roman finds from a theoretically informed perspective.

The primary focus of data gathering will be Roman brooches recorded with the PAS, with a study area loosely centred on Northern England[2].  Brooches from excavations offer a control sample tied to stratigraphically dated deposits, but excavation is naturally biased in its nature, in the antiquarian past mostly high status sites were excavated. Some areas are chosen methodically (e.g. the forts on Hadrians wall chosen for their dating evidence) but more recently excavation has been developer led which does not take into account any archaeological research objectives. It is hoped within this project to geographically fill some gaps in our knowledge by looking at the PAS data, together with and compared to, the excavated data. There are c. 1300 Roman brooches recorded on the PAS database (1) from the Northern region, which will greatly supplement the known archaeologically recovered examples (e.g the 845 brooches catalogued by Snape 1993).

A catalogue of the brooches will be created which can be used alongside the syntheses produced of excavated material.  Due to the large number of brooches to be looked at in this study it will be impossible to examine all brooches in detail. After data has been gathered, detailed case studies will be established, looking either at specific geographical areas or certain types of brooches. Preliminary research suggests the Wirral brooch as an ideal type for a case study. The type was first noted and published in 1999 by Philpott (pp274-285), who thought that they originated on the Wirral due to their large concentration around the South of the Wirral (at that time almost 50% of known examples (12) were from just 1 site). This brooch also seems to be a British variant on the Roman style Trumpet brooch, which makes it an interesting case study of the acceptance of Roman fashions with British influence. Apart from Philpotts work little study has gone into these brooches, it may be possible to distinguish different classes within this type once they have been catalogued more accurately. It is also hoped to confirm the origin of the style of the brooch, Philpott talks about the brooch drawing on a number of decorative and stylistic features of other brooches’ and also whether the Wirral brooch influenced any other types.

Since Philpotts 1999 publication, the number of Wirral brooches known has more than doubled (from England, Wales and Scotland), mostly through the work of the PAS and it is anticipated that this number will continue to rise. As a result of Philpott’s consideration of the origin and possible manufacturing area of this brooch type, alloy composition analysis[3] will be carried out on all Wirral brooches available for testing (as well as some waste products from one of the most productive sites). By doing this it is hoped that it can be seen if they were all made from the same alloy mix. If they are all the same composition it will point to one source for the brooches and will be an interesting view into metal working during the Roman period. Dungworth carried out analysis of Iron Age and Roman copper-alloys from northern Britain and this work will be useful to look at for known practices (2006). Exploring the connections between the brooches metallurgy will add another dimension to exploring social connections. A new distribution map will be constructed and alongside the alloy analysis will hopefully be able to assess Philpott’s hypothesis as well as extend our knowledge of this regional style.

The distribution patterns of some brooch types are already known to suggest differences between the North and South, for example the Dragonesque brooch. It is hoped that this study may show if there are any differences in the distribution of brooches within the North and so demonstrate intraregional differences. The concentration of Wirral brooches with only a few outliers is again a good example of this. Further research will address variations within types and update current knowledge of the distribution and use of brooches. By combining the newly collected data with that previously known it is hoped a fuller understanding of the brooches in the North will be gained.

The study will be placed in the theoretical context of creolization studies, which have been argued to offer a more sophisticated and balanced model than the formerly preferred models of Romanization (Webster 2005). This perspective offers a more nuanced view of ‘Roman’ and ‘native’ interaction, recognizing the ‘natives’ as active participants in cultural negotiation. Such a perspective also more greatly allows for variation over time that is not found in Romanization models. By adopting a creolization model, the study becomes more than just a review of artefact typologies and distributions and will attempt to look at social dynamics through material culture.

Bibliography

Dungworth, D. 2006. Iron Age and Roman Copper Alloys from Northern Britain. http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue2/dungworth­_index.html

Philpott, P. 1999. A Romano-British Brooch Type from North-Western and Northern England. Britannia 30 (Notes) pp274-285.

Snape, M. 1993. Roman Brooches from North Britain. A classification and a catalogue of brooches from sites on the Stanegate. BAR 235. Webster, J. ‘Historical Archaeology and the Middle Passage’. Journal of Maritime Research, 2005. Available at: http://www.jmr.nmm.ac.uk.

1. www.findsdatabase.org.uk


[1] A voluntary recording scheme for archaeological objects found by members of the public started in 1997. www.finds.org.uk

[2] This includes the counties of Yorkshire, Northumberland, Durham, Cumbria, Cheshire, Lancashire, Greater Manchester, Merseyside and also some of North Wales and Southern Scotland.

[3] Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy will be carried out.

All change in Cheshire, Greater Manchester and Merseyside

June 6th, 2008 by Frances McIntosh

This is just to update people as to the FLO post for these 3 counties. From September I will be going part time in order to start an MLitt at Newcastle University. There will hopefully be someone else coming in part time so that the post is still going to be filled full time.

To keep things organised the area will be split geographically- at least for club and museum visits. I will continue to visit Bolton and Manchester Museums and the 5 clubs around Greater Manchester- Bolton, North West, Tameside, Wilmslow and Stockport. The other person will visit the Salt Museum, Northwich and the Grosvenor Museum. They will visit the following clubs- Mold, South Lancs and Cheshire, West Kirby and Crewe and Nantwich.

The museums will still be visited once a month and the clubs every 3 months as I have been doing so there should be no real disruption to routines, some people will just have a new person to meet. We will both still be based at Liverpool as I am now and so people can come into that office.

Latest Wirral Brooch

December 18th, 2007 by Frances McIntosh

Just this week I have recorded a Wirral brooch which was actually found on the Wirral. This is the exact place we want to see them, keep them coming! This is a great example as most of the distinguishing features are still visible despite some wear and corrosion and the enamel is still so bright. Look it up on the database at LVPL-64EDF0.

LVPL-64EDF0PAS record number: LVPL-64EDF0
Object type: Brooch
Broadperiod: Roman
County of discovery: Merseyside
Stable url: http://www.finds.org.uk/database/artefacts/record/id/203502

Update on the North West

December 13th, 2007 by Frances McIntosh

Last Friday I went to meet James Purnell who is the Secretary for the Department of Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). I had arranged this meeting after Dr. Brian Iddon (MP for Bolton South East) visited an event in Bolton during National Archaeology Week. This led him to ask Mr Purnell a question about the funding of PAS during questions in parliament. As Mr. Purnell is the MP for Hyde and Staleybridge, which comes under my area, I decided to ask for a meeting with him to talk about the PAS and the work it does, particularly in the Greater Manchester Area.

On the day, one of the metal detectorists I work with, Glen Lister from the North West club came along and brought some of his best finds to show the minister.  Roger Bland (head of the scheme) also accompanied us to help us drive home the message about our funding issues. We had about half an hour to discuss the PAS with Mr Purnell and show him the good work we have been doing. Glen brought along some Medieval and Roman coins and a Bronze Age axe for Mr Purnell to see. He was very interested in the finds and was amazed at the condition of them considering their age. I had brought with me the Kraftig Profilierte brooch which is mentioned in my blog previously, as this is a great example of how recording the location of stray finds can be so important to our understanding of the past.

We then got around to the nitty gritty of the meeting and started explaining to Mr Purnell the effects of reducing funding for the scheme. He seemed sympathetic but gave a very typical Politician’s answer of not committing to anything!

However the meeting was a good opportunity to show someone who has a say in the future of the Scheme, exactly what we do. My thanks to Glen for coming along and talking about dealing with the Scheme from the view of a detectorist.

Wirral brooches

November 23rd, 2007 by Frances McIntosh

In 1999 a new type of Roman bow brooch was identified by Dr Philpott and named the Wirral brooch. It is very distinctive in design and it is thought that they could perhaps have originated from the Wirral with only a couple of work-shops making them. Not many are known to have been found and most of these have come from metal detectorists. This is a plea for anyone who has a Wirral type brooch which hasn’t been reported to the PAS to do so as I am hoping to make more of an in depth study of them to try and find their origin. It would be nice to prove that the Wirral was a producer of such a nice brooch and show that the North is not always the poor relation of the south in terms of finds.

Most of the brooches have been found in the North West which is one of the reasons for thinking they may be local. They are very distinctive in their design and once you have seen one you will know exactly what to look for.

Characteristics to look out for are -

  1. Stepped head- often decorated or enamelled
  2. A rectangular panel with 3 strips infilled with enamel in alternate colours
  3. A loop on the head of the brooch
  4. A stud/boss at the waist of the brooch
  5. The foot consists of 3 or 4 disc-like mouldings, possibly decorated

Here is an example which is almost complete- only the loop and the pin area missing.

Roman Brooches in the North West…

November 23rd, 2007 by Frances McIntosh

…well, Greater Manchester, Merseyside and Cheshire really. Nick Herepath, my predecessor did a study on this topic in the past and I am hoping to continue this with plans for expansion and diversification. To this end I thought I would let people know what I am doing and then you can all help!

Firstly I want to collate the data for all the Roman brooches in the aforementioned area, recorded on the PAS, or as stray finds through the SMR/HERs. This will enable me to look at patterns of brooch types in this area compared with the South and the rest of England. So if anyone out there has a Roman brooch from my area which is unrecorded, please come forward and see me to record it.

Secondly I want to carry out some work on Wirral type brooches. This is a type named/discovered by Rob Philpott in 1997. I will put up pictures and descriptions of them in the next post. Basically I want to prove Rob’s theory that this type of bow brooch was produced on the Wirral and then distributed out. Or at the very least that it originated from this are. I will be doing this by taking very very small samples of the brooch and analysing it to find out it’s alloy composition. Matt Ponting at the University of Liverpool has very kindly agreed to do most of the analysis using his machines in the uni. Once we know the composition of the alloys we can compare them all and see if they are the same/not.

There are very few of these brooches known about/recorded. This is another plea to all those detectorists/members of the public who may have one hidden at home, not realising what it is or how much you could help with an interesting study to prove that the Wirral made something pretty amazing. So if you think (after reading my next post) that you may have one of these brooches, the please get in touch with me.

I will try to keep people updated with my research on this topic. I have already done a little spotlight on a Kraftig profilierte type which will fit nicely into the catalogue (in the distant future!)

Welcome

November 23rd, 2007 by daniel pett

Welcome to the blog for the FLO for Greater Manchester, Merseyside and Cheshire!

I seem to have done this the wrong way round as I posted articles before saying hello, ah well!

I am hoping to use this blog to show people what I am up to and why it often takes me 3months to return your finds! Any research I do on specific finds I will put up on here so people have a chance to learn more. I’ll also try to put up pictures and details of any special events/rallies I attend/run.

This blog is also a means for finders (or just people interested in archaeology) in my area to get involved. I’m not 100% sure how this works yet but I will find out if people want to join in.

Watch this space for news and information

London Toys in a Rural style

November 22nd, 2007 by daniel pett

Mr Lawrence Moulsdale found a lead figurine of a woman in Higher Kinnerton, Flintshire, whilst out detecting early in 2007. He brought it to his local FLO, Frances McIntosh for further identication, dating and recording onto the PAS database. Frances recognised it as being most-likely Post-Medieval but could not see any parallels in the relevant literature. She passed the photograph onto Geoff Egan, Finds Advisor for Medieval and Post-Medieval Finds for the PAS. He has a keen interest in lead figurines and got very excited about Mr. Moulsdale’s woman. He suggested it as rural version of the more detailed hollow cast lead toys which Elizabethan London children played with dating to the late 16th century. Mr. Moulsdale’s example is solid and has been cast fairly crudely, although it does have some detail on the dress and the hair.

LVPL-834150PAS record number: LVPL-834150
Object type: Figurine
Broadperiod: Post Medieval
County of discovery: Flintshire
Stable url: http://www.finds.org.uk/database/artefacts/record/id/189193

This find is the first of its type to be known and as such is a very important find even though it perhaps doesn’t look that exciting. Several versions of London’s more sophisticated toys have been found and Geoff had long harboured suspicions that there must have been similar playthings over the rest of the country. It seems unlikely that only London children would have had these types of toys and visiting people would have seen these and perhaps copied them. Metal Detecting is a way to get an idea of what was going in the large rural areas in the past. By recording their finds metal detectorists are helping to fill in the large gaps of our knowledge to give a more rounded picture of our country’s history.

Kraftig Profilierte Brooch- What is it doing in Atherton?

November 22nd, 2007 by daniel pett

Mr Jackson was metal detecting one day in March, near Atherton, Wigan when he found a Roman bow brooch. He brought it to show to his local Finds Liaison Officer, Frances McIntosh at the Bolton Museum. She identified it as a Kraftig-profilierte type and was quite excited about the find, specifically its location.

It has been recorded on the database as LVPL-1B0623. Mr. Jackson has kindly donated it to be used as part of the handling collection. Kraftig-profilierte means ‘strongly profiled’. This type of brooch is defined as a one piece brooch with a spring of c.8 turns. It has a superior chord held by a rearward facing hook above a wide crossbar. The upper bow expands towards a narrower neck at the head and the profile is highly arched and angular above a central encircling moulding. The foot is narrower and curves upwards towards a terminal knob (Bayley and Butcher; 2004; 59). Hattatt gives them a date of around the first half of the first century AD (1982; 104) This type of brooch is fairly unusual in Britain with only c.30 being known.

LVPL-1B0623PAS record number: LVPL-1B0623
Object type: Brooch
Broadperiod: Roman
County of discovery: Greater Manchester
Stable url: http://www.finds.org.uk/database/artefacts/record/id/189956

Their origin is thought to be Pannonia, an area around the Danube and Rhine. The 9th Legion had been recruited from this area and then came over to England with the invasion of Britain, bringing the Kraftig-profilierte with them (Simpson; 1979; 330). The known examples from archaeological excavations are mostly from the East and South East of England (e.g. Colchester and Richborough). This has been thought to be because this is where the 9th Legion were based/passed through. They are known to have been at Longthorpe (45-66 AD), Lincoln (66-71 AD) and York, reaching there by 71 and staying until c.120. Five of these brooches have been recorded on the PAS database prior to Mr. Jackson’s, all from places in the South East such as Kent, Ditchling and Essex. Due to the small number of this type found it was thought that this style/type was never actually made in Britain. The ones being found came from soldiers who brought the brooch over to this country from Pannonia

However this view is starting to change. An example of a Pannonian brooch has been found during recent excavations at Wroxeter (2002; 103-4 fig 4.7 no 28). The authors of this report say-

“the basic message is that the Pannonian arrived early in small numbers and failed to travel as far as Hod Hill… Wroxeter is one of the few assured finds in advance of the Fosse Way “.

Mr. Jackson’s example, along with the one from Wroxeter, starts to put into question the idea that the Pannonian type was not made in Britain. It is thought that the Kraftig type is the precursor of the British Trumpet brooch (Hattatt; 1982; 104-7) and alloy compositional studies have also suggested that some of the British examples could have been made here as copies of this style (Bayley and Butcher; 2004; 148). Variations would have occurred as the British brooch makers created their own versions of the Kraftig type and enough similarities can be seen between the trumpet and the Kraftig to see the transition to this new form took place.

This is a case which shows how important it is to be recording find spots and also highlights how individual finds can really change our ideas about certain things. There are different possibilities about how this brooch ended up so far West compared to all previous examples. Possibly it was exchanged or given as a gift to someone who then travelled over to this part of the country. It could be that one of the 9th came over this way for some reason. Or it could be that this type of brooch was made in Britain and that the NW brooch makers were starting to copy this Continental style. Just because more haven’t been found does not mean there are not more there. What we find is only a small proportion of the material culture which existed in the past. The locality of this brooch supports the Wroxeter example and the alloy studies in changing previous views about this brooch type.

Bibliography

Hattatt, R. 1982. Ancient and Romano-British Brooches. Dorset Publishing Company

Bayley, J and Butcher, S. 2004. Roman Brooches in Britain: A technological and typological study based on the Richborough Collection. The Society of Antiquaries London.

Simpson, G. 1979. Some British and Iberian pennanular brooches and other early types in the Rhineland and the Decumates Agri. Antiquaries Journal, 59. 319-42. English Heritage. 2002. The Legionary Fortress at Wroxeter. English Heritage Report 19.

Community Excavation

November 22nd, 2007 by daniel pett

During September and October a 4 week community excavation took place around Leasowe Lighthouse, Wirral. It was very popular with members of the public and here I’ve written up short pieces about the 3 main groups who got involved:

Adult learners/volunteers

The community excavation on the Wirral at Leasowe Lighthouse was very popular with the local people wanting to learn more about archaeology. 140 people signed up to volunteer over the 4 weeks and we had to turn some people away due to over-subscription. No experience was necessary, people just had to be prepared to get muddy and possibly wet! On site there was the opportunity to learn the skills needed to be a field archaeologist. These include digging, planning and the post-excavation tasks of washing and sorting the finds. We had our base and finds processing room inside the lighthouse itself and so volunteers had a dry place to escape in case of rain. There were 2 trenches on the side of the lighthouse which were placed to uncover the outbuildings from the lighthouse when it was occupied. On one side was a stable and coach house, the other set of buildings included the water cistern, washroom and toilet.

These structures were demolished sometime in the late 1930s and it is thought were built around 1800. Some volunteers were slightly disappointed that we weren’t digging Roman remains but for a training excavation this sort of archaeology is perfect. There were lots of walls and clearly defined layers which meant that the volunteers could understand the basics of archaeology. When the archaeologists explained about different contexts and differences in soil colour they could see easily these features. It also meant that people could get on with things without worrying too much about going through a layer (as is sometimes the case on prehistoric sites) as the soil colour/texture was markedly different. The excavation produced lots of finds which, although again not very old or perhaps exciting, were just what we needed to show people the entire process from excavation through to preparing finds for a report. Volunteers were shown how to wash and sort finds and the importance of their provenance (i.e. context number) was stressed again. We discussed how archaeology is really destruction of a site, layer by layer, and because of this we must ensure that we record what we destroy. They also learnt that sometimes archaeology can be monotonous as you wash your 100th piece of glass for the day!

Overall the excavation has been a success and has allowed a large number of people to experience first hand. We had a broad range of people volunteering and often had some lively debates at lunchtimes about other archaeological issues/ new discoveries in the area. This type of interaction and debate further opens archaeology to the members of the public and allows them to understand how archaeologists make the interpretations they do, from the evidence they have. Hopefully there will be opportunities to carry out more of these projects in the future as this one has shown there is definitely an interest for it in the public!

Metal Detecting Survey

For one week of the community excavation members of the West Kirby Metal Detecting Club were invited to come and detect on and around the site at Leasowe. This allowed us to build up a picture of the wider area around the lighthouse and would, we hoped, uncover some more finds from the more distant past of the Wirral.

Over the week around 30 metal detectorists (individuals as well as club members) took part in the survey. Every find was logged with a GPS to an 8 or 10 figure grid reference and bagged individually. Unfortunately nothing of significance was found, the oldest object being an 1860s silver penny. However it was still a very useful and interesting project. It allowed the volunteers on site to see how metal detecting can be used to aid archaeologists. This provoked a few discussions about how metal detecting can help to fill in gaps in our knowledge of an areas past. The metal detectorists also got a chance to see the excavation and look how archaeologists work. I feel this gave them an insight into why archaeologists are sometimes so appalled at the way metal detectorists dig their finds out. They saw how painstaking excavation can be and understood the contrast in the 2 groups’ methods. Understanding how the ‘other side’ works can only be beneficial in improving the working relationships between archaeologists and metal detectorists.

School groups

Throughout the 4 weeks of the community excavation we had 7 groups of school children from the local primary schools come to learn more about archaeology and see the site. They came for 2 hours and did a variety of activities which involved them ‘being archaeologists’ for their time with us. Some of them had been to the lighthouse before, some had watched Time Team and others knew very little about history, local or not. We started at the basics and asked them what archaeology was. We had some varied answers but encouragingly some of the children already understood that archaeology is not rocks and dinosaurs! During their visit the children were shown the site and looked at some of the finds which had been found there. They saw how we were excavating and looked at the plans compared to what was left in the ground. Rob Philpott talked to them about the wider history of the area and how people had lived here from prehistoric times. They then had a chance to wash some pottery which had been excavated from the Manchester Dock at Liverpool. We explained the significance of having them clean so we could match the fragments up. Next they sorted the pottery they had washed into different types by colour and pattern. Lastly they had the chance to record small finds on their own. We gave them an object from the handling collection and they had to answer a series of questions and then measure and draw their object. This was a good activity as it made them use their questioning skills as well as writing and some maths. Working out how old something is from when it was made is quite taxing! They took these sheets home with them as a souvenir of their time as an archaeologist. I feel these sessions were very enjoyable for the children involved and that they learnt a lot about the history of their local area and archaeological processes.

« Newer Posts

The content contained within the Blog's pages do not represent an official position from any of the organisations associated with the Portable Antiquities Scheme. They are solely those of the post's author.