Finds for Schools

July 29th, 2008 by Steve Ashby

Dave and Tim

Given that we’ve just had National Archaeology Week (soon to become the Festival of British Archaeology), and the web is full of pictures of children getting involved in archaeology, I thought you might be interested in what the PAS do. You already know about much of our outreach work with schools and after-school groups (see our annual reports for specific examples), and our PASt EXPLORERS website, but I thought you might be interested to hear about what detectorists themselves are up to.

So, here’s a nice little story, relating to two of Northamptonshire’s star finders. Tim Binns and Dave Derby are a couple of prolific detectorists, and have been regular recorders with both me and my predecessor,Tom. Dave has been detecting for 30 years, while Tim has been at it for five years, but both are extremely dedicated to responsible detecting, always recording with good findspot data (often with a GPS, at up to 12 figures), and always with an eye to the archaeological importance of any find or site. They really do present an excellent example of the kind of practice that the PAS tries to promote.

As I’ve said, Dave and Tim always record their finds with the local FLO (yours truly), and I provide them with a printout of the database report and photograph. They have both had some lovely, and archaeologically important finds, but of course, not everything is equally impressive to look at, and for us, the value of many finds is in knowing about where they came from. Anyway. just a few weeks ago, I learned something about what happens to many of the less impressive finds, after I return them to Dave and Tim. In many instances, they donate their finds to local schools, and use the finds reports to explain what the objects are. I thought this not only an extremely generous gesture, but also one that has really positive implications for archaeology and education.

Do you remember your history lessons at school? 1066, 1415, 1588, 1605, 1666 etc etc etc… Just imagine how much more fun they would have been if you could have touched real objects from the past – simple things like Roman and medieval coins, brooches, and military badges would make all the difference. And imagine if you could have ago at being an archaeologist (or a FLO!), drawing, measuring and weighing these objects, and trying to identify them based on what they looked like.

Through their generosity, that’s exactly what Dave and Tim have helped to put in place. Just think- have you got piles of worn Roman grot, or broken pieces of brooch in your scrap box that you never look at? Why not try following Tim and Dave’s lead, and take them along to a local school or youth group. Of course, we would like to record anything first, so that there’s a permanent record for researchers and the general public, and that record could then be used to help children learn. Go on, have a think about it.

Well done Tim and Dave! It’s great to see Northants detectorists leading the way!

Local Find Donated to Museum

July 23rd, 2008 by Frances McIntosh

A detectorist has recently donated a really interesting find to National Museums Liverpool. It was found in the Hale area of Cheshire which is just outside Liverpool. It’s locality makes it more important as north of the River Mersey finds are not abundant- especially finds as nice as this one. This find will hopefully go into the new Museum of Liverpool which is planned to open in 2010

The find is a face mount, from furniture or a vessel. It is Roman in date but has Celtic influences in it’s design. It is recorded on the database as LVPL-1DBDD5. It is a female face, representing Medusa, one of the Gorgons, and the only one who was mortal. Her gaze could turn whoever she looked upon to stone. There is a particular myth in which Medusa was originally a beautiful maiden. She desecrated Athena’s temple by lying there with Poseidon. Outraged, Athena turned Medusa’s hair into living snakes. Medusa is represented as a fierce female nearly always with a frontal rather than a profile head. She was often used as an apotropaic amulet.

Northants Review Part III: The Roman Period

July 18th, 2008 by Steve Ashby

Hello again! We’re back with a review of the data from Roman Northants; thanks again to my assistant Katie Robbins for all her backgound research.

Roman Horse Figurine

During the Roman period (traditionally dated AD 43-410), Northamptonshire sees considerable expansion in several areas of life and commerce, including the intensification of agricultural production, the establishment of craft and industry, the construction of road networks and the foundation of market settlements and religious centres.

Roman figurative bust

Small towns developed at Towcester, Titchmarsh, Kettering and Duston, all bound together by the expansive Roman road network. The identification of earlier settlement activity at many of these locations suggests that these Roman roads often followed the routes of prehistoric pathways (another issue that controlled and targetted detecting and reporting might help to address). Other nucleated settlements were scattered throughout the county, and rural settlement in particular shows interesting patterning. Many ‘non-villa’ rural settlements seem to have been abandoned or transformed with the coming of the Romans, perhaps reconstructed in rectilinear forms around trackways and ditched enclosures. For example, in in the north-east of the county, the 2nd century saw the replacement of Iron Age round houses by aisled buildings and villas. However, in central and south Northamptonshire, these typically Iron Age constructions continued to develop alongside the newly introduced row-type villas. This distinction raises important questions about the nature of settlement and identity in different parts of the county; are we seeing discrete local political situations and identities? And could metal detected finds help to clarify what was going on?

Roman vessel mount

Whatever the explanation of this local variation, villas are fairly well known right across the county, though there is considerable variation in morphology. Building types range from large, complex constructions to much smaller, simpler affairs. Agriculture, trade and industry blossomed in Romano-British Northants, and this is again an area in which detected finds might be informative. In addition to more traditional crop farming, there is evidence for grape-growing (presumably for wine), while the local ceramic and quarry-stone industries were also important. However, perhaps most notable is the importance of the iron industry, and parts of the county may have been reponsible for extraction of much of the ore required to run the regional and military economies of Roman Britain.

Roman amphora strapend

Moving away from the practicalities of day-to-day living, we also know alittle about the beliefs of the inhabitants of Roman-British Northants. A number of possible religious sites have been identified, and detected finds such as figurines, votive axes, or objects bearing Christian iconography (such as the Chi-Ro symbol) might be clues as to the presence of such shrines or temple sites.

Late Roman buckle and openwork plate

In short, Roman Northants is probably better understood than its prehistoric counterpart. We know of a number of towns in the county, and archaeology – in some cases undertaken with the co-operation of metal detectorists – is helping us to answer a lot of important social and economic questions. However, the countryside is more poorly understood; we have lots of villas and small settlements in the county, but what was going on between these sites, and how were people moving though the landscape? Obviously the major roads like Watling Street played an important role, but surely there were many smaller trackways and meeting points that we don’t know about. Conceivably, metal detected finds, when properly provenanced with findspot details, can help us to identify some of these sites.

A Roman Enameled Knee Brooch

A good example of this is provided by the data that came out of last year’s rally at Islip – more on that later if I get around to it! In the meantime, here’s a quick run through of some of the most exciting finds we’ve had.

We’ve had lots of Roman finds from the county; they are far and away the most numerous of all the things I see. Unusual decorative items include this unusual (presumably ritually depsoited ) equestrian figurine from Brigstock (NARC-81AAB5), this bust (which may perhaps be the anthopomorphic butt of a knife handle) from Nether Heyford (NARC-E6A001), and this mount (NARC-9BBD94) from Titchmarsh. The precise functions of all are unclear, but both display asethetic qualities and are suggestive of specialised manufacture. Dress accessories such as brooches are more commonly found; nice examples include this enamelled knee brooch (NARC-96E378) from Norton, this ‘amphora-shaped’ strapend from Moulton (NARC-DF98F1), and this lovely late Roman military buckle from Hinton-in-the-Hedges (NARC-C6E5B8).

However, perhaps the star of the last few years is this rather unassuming nail cleaner from the Daventry area, which thus far is unparalleled anywhere in Europe (NARC-733D28).

Unusual Anthropomorphic Nail Cleaner

There was also an amazingly intricately cast steelyard weight (NARC-8D6343) from Paulerspury, which, together with a number of similar (if less ornate) PAS finds, and artefacts from excavations as several villa sites around the county, stands as testament to the importance of trade in the region.

On the subject of trade, let’s not forget the coins. Quite apart from all the ‘grot’ (as the number of Roman coins from Northants to date stands at 3351 records, it is really starting to provide an invaluable resource for understanding economy and settlement in Roman Northamptonshire), we’ve had one or two coins that are notable in aesthetic and numismatic terms, including unusual nummi (NARC-8CF536 and NARC-78D771), and rare silver denarii of Marc Antony (NARC-E2D310) and Antoninus Pius (NARC-A3E503).

Recently, we had this unusual barbarous coin, copying a radiate of Salonina (wife of Gallienus). There is only one coin like this in the entire Cunetio hoard! It might not look like much to most of us, but Sam, the PAS’s coin guru at the BM, picked it out. So please don’t forget to show us your grot! Bring it in, bring it in, bring it in!

Exciting New Coin from Cheshire!!

July 17th, 2008 by Frances McIntosh

As promised here are more details about the Quadrans which was recorded with me from Cheshire. I have been really lucky as this is my 2nd one of these in less than 18 months (there are less than 10 on the PAS database I think).

This one is a Quadrans of Antoninus Pius (138-161), minted in Rome, 140-144 AD. It seems to be an unpublished variety of quadrans which makes it an even more important find. As well as being a rare denomination of coin, it could be unique! And this is a coin which was in a bag with c.100 other Roman ‘grots’

The coin is recorded as LVPL-F139A5

Obverse- Laureate head right

Reverse- Two clasped hands, holding cauceus and two corn ears

Interesting Roman find from North Yorkshire

July 17th, 2008 by Frances McIntosh

This is a really nice case of where an archaeologist spotted a find on UKDFD and, realising it was an important find, asked the detectorist to show it to his local FLO so they could record it. They promptly did this and now we have another really interesting find recorded for all to see.

It is a copper alloy Roman tripod mount. 2 of these have previously been recorded on the PAS database (LIN-1632D1 and YORYM-EC06D2) but both of these are very different in style to the one brought into me at Manchester. They both depict Romanised gods (Bacchus and possibly Harpocrates respectively). The North Yorkshire one (recorded as LVPL-CB8B04) does not seem to be representative of anyone in particular and the design style used on it is much more reminiscent of Celtic art than the more fancy Roman design on the other 2.

This is not to say it is cruder- just that it is different. It is probably more interesting than the other two because of its design. It shows a Roman object (the tripod) was not only being used by British people but that they were making this object and altering it to fit into their art styles. These are not common finds in

Britain and this appears to be the first in this style to be found. There are other tripod mounts known from excavations both in Britain and from the continent (Belgium and Germany) but these all seem to be similar in style to the other two mounts recorded on the database.

This shows just how important it is that we all collaborate to record finds- without the metal detectorist we would not have been shown this find and now have the information. In turn the metal detectorist now knows much more about his object than before.

The content contained within the Blog's pages do not represent an official position from any of the organisations associated with the Portable Antiquities Scheme. They are solely those of the post's author.